Discrimination & Harassment

If you are an employee who has experienced discrimination or harassment in the workplace, you know all too well how painful and career-altering such conduct can be.  Generally, discrimination means less favorable treatment because of a bias against someone based on age, gender/sex, disability, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or gender identity.  Discrimination can take many forms and can negatively affect your hiring, conditions of employment, compensation, or prospects for promotion. It can even get you fired.

Harassment involves conduct by the employer, supervisor, or co-worker that includes unwelcome advances or other conduct that is so offensive, intimidating, or abusive that it changes your work environment or even affects your performance.  We understand that harassment in the workplace can take many forms, and can dramatically harm your relationship with the employer, your opportunities for success at your job, and your emotional and physical well-being.

Outten & Golden’s attorneys represent employees who have suffered illegal discrimination and/or harassment in the workplace.  We are well-versed in the federal, state, and local laws, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, that offer varying degrees of protection for employees, as well as the federal and state agencies and courts where discrimination and/or harassment claims can be filed, such as the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.  We work with our clients to evaluate their discrimination and/or harassment claims and to identify and reach their goals in attaining justice for the wrong done to them.  To learn more about our firm and about the types of discrimination and harassment prohibited under the law, please click on the specific practice areas listed on the left side of this page.

(*Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.)

Contact Us
Briefly describe how we can help you concerning your employment issue.
 
Find O&G attorneys associated with this area
Attorneys
Cara E. Greene - Employment Discrimination Lawyer New York City

Cara E. Greene

Partner
New York Office

Menaka N. Fernando

Partner
San Francisco Office
Gregory Chiarello - New York Employment Retaliation Lawyer

Gregory S. Chiarello

Partner
New York Office
Related Cases

Victor Hwa vs Lockheed Martin Corporation

Status:
Active
Updated:

On January 10th, 2023, Outten & Golden filed a lawsuit on behalf of Victor Hwa, a Chinese-American aeronautical engineer, against his former employer, Lockheed Martin. Mr. Hwa worked for Lockheed from 2017 to 2021 as a Staff Engineer in the Propulsion Department. The lawsuit alleges that Mr...

Social Finance

Status:
Active

On May 19, 2020, Ruben Juarez filed a nationwide class action lawsuit against SoFi, a major online personal finance company, challenging policies which deny DACA recipients equal access to student loans and other financial products.  The lawsuit, Juarez v. Social Finance, Case No. 3:20-cv-03386-...

News

Litigator of the Week Runners

Law.com

Outten & Golden who reached a settlement this week with Goldman Sachs in the long-running class action accusing the bank of discriminating against women in both pay and promotions. The bank agreed to pay $215 million to settle claims brought on behalf of about 2,800 female associates and vice presidents employed in its investment banking, investment management or securities divisions over a roughly 20-year period. As part of the deal, Goldman also agreed to bring on independent experts to evaluate its performance review process and gender pay disparities. The team representing the...

Activision Can't Get Calif. Civil Rights Watchdog Sanctioned

Law360

Law360 (May 11, 2023, 3:36 PM EDT) -- A federal judge rejected Activision Blizzard's bid for sanctions on California's civil rights agency for what the company called improper efforts to interfere with its $18 million sex bias settlement with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, saying the state enforcer isn't bound by that deal.

U.S. District Judge Dale S. Fischer on Wednesday denied Activision's motion for an order that the California Civil Rights Department, which was formerly called the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, be forced to comply with...

Goldman to Pay $215 Million to End Case on Underpaying Women

Bloomberg

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. has agreed to pay $215 million to put an end to a long-running class-action lawsuit that accused the Wall Street giant of systemically underpaying women.

 

The New York-based bank struck the deal with lawyers representing about 2,800 female associates and vice-presidents, according to a joint statement from the bank and the plaintiffs’ lawyers.

Publications & Articles

California Employment Law

Among other important topics, California Employment Law covers the essentials of the employment relationship, including mutual rights and duties, duration, and termination; discrimination based on such factors as gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, race, religion, and national origin; workplace harassment; leaves of absence; wage and hour rules; trade secrets; employment torts; and whistleblowing.

Can Law Firm Partners Sue The Firm For Employment Discrimination?

Employment attorneys Wayne Outten and Justin Swartz. This article originally appeared in Law Journal Newsletters' Law Firm Partnership & Benefits Report, February 2004. For more information, visit www.ljnonline.com.

This article will first discuss reasons that law firms, especially large firms, are susceptible to discrimination suits by their partners. Next, it will explain two threshold requirements for law firm partners to sue their firms for employment discrimination. Both of these requirements turn on whether certain partners are deemed employees. Third, the article will discuss the Supreme Court’s Clackamas decision and lower court decisions that preceded Clackamas but used similar analyses. Finally, it will note that,under some federal and state laws, law firms are vulnerable even if their partners are not deemed employees.Discussion of: reasons law firms may be susceptible to discrimination suits by their partners; two required thresholds for filing such a suit; Supreme Court's Clackamas decision; and finally a note on why some law firms are vulnerable even if their partners are not deemed employees.

Get Used To More Davids Becoming Dianes

Kathleen Peratis, The Forward, July 24, 2008. A brief discussion of who transgender people are, and the differences between transgender and gay people.

You have to hand it to Rep. Barney Frank, the man knows how to empathize. In the first-ever congressional hearing on workplace discrimination against transgender people, held by the House in late June in an Education and Labor subcommittee, Frank said he understands what it means to be trapped in the wrong body — because that is what happens when his legislation gets bogged down over in the Senate.

The lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender — or LGBT, for short — press called the congressional hearing on gender identity discrimination “historic” and “groundbreaking.” The mainstream media pretty much ignored it, but the issue is worth keeping an eye on.