EEOC v. Morgan Stanley
Popular Issues
Latest Cases & Investigations
EEOC v. Morgan Stanley
Perez, et al. v. Allstate
Rotondo v. JPMorgan
Strauch v. Computer Science Corp.
Burr v. Loadsmart
Wilmuth et al v. Amazon
Latest Posts
Uber Eats is one of the country’s leading food delivery services. It has an especially strong presence in New York City, where Uber and similar companies employ 70,000 delivery workers who make 2.72 million deliveries per week.
The lawsuit alleged that Uber violated the Fair Chance Act, which makes it illegal for most employers in New York City to consider an applicant’s criminal history before making a job offer.
New York City’s Fair Chance Act is a “ban the box” law. It places questions about an applicant’s criminal history later in the hiring process so they can be evaluated based on their qualifications first, without the stigma of a criminal record and an immediate rejection. It’s part of the city’s antidiscrimination law, known as the New York City Human Rights Law.
The Fair Chance Act also prohibits employers from rescinding a job offer unless certain factors are met, such as whether the offense has a relationship to the position, the applicant would present an unreasonable risk, or there’s evidence of rehabilitation.
According to the Uber lawsuit, the company did not properly weigh these factors before rejecting workers.
The plaintiffs also accused Uber of unlawfully failing to provide them with a copy of their individualized assessments before nixing their job offers. Employers are supposed to give applicants an opportunity to dispute or explain information that turns up in a background check.
In addition to payments to class members, Uber agreed to update its background check process to better support job applicants with criminal histories and ensure it follows the Fair Chance Act.