EEOC v. Morgan Stanley
Popular Issues
Latest Cases & Investigations
EEOC v. Morgan Stanley
Perez, et al. v. Allstate
Rotondo v. JPMorgan
Strauch v. Computer Science Corp.
Burr v. Loadsmart
Wilmuth et al v. Amazon
Latest Posts
According to this first-in-the-nation proposed class action lawsuit, Eightfold AI’s platform allegedly generates secretive, AI‑driven “consumer reports” on job applicants—often without their knowledge, consent, or any opportunity to correct errors—before the reports are used to screen them for jobs.
Eightfold’s technology allegedly operates behind the scenes of online job applications at some of the nation’s largest employers.
While applicants submit resumes and wait for a response, Eightfold allegedly scrapes vast amounts of personal data—much of it inaccurate, incomplete, or drawn from unknown third-party sources—and funnels it through a proprietary large language model to score and rank candidates based on their supposed “likelihood of success” in the role.
Just like employment background checks, the lawsuit describes how these AI-generated evaluations function as consumer reports under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and California law. Yet the complaint alleges that Eightfold provides none of the basic legal protections that have governed such reports for decades: no disclosure that a report exists, no access to the report itself, no opportunity to dispute errors, and no safeguards before the information is used to make life-altering employment decisions.
The workers in this proposed class action are represented by Christopher M. McNerney, Jenny R. Yang, and Allison Aaronson of Outten & Golden LLP; and Rachel W. Dempsey, David Seligman, and Seth Frotman of Towards Justice.