EEOC v. Morgan Stanley
Popular Issues
Latest Cases & Investigations
EEOC v. Morgan Stanley
Perez, et al. v. Allstate
Rotondo v. JPMorgan
Strauch v. Computer Science Corp.
Burr v. Loadsmart
Wilmuth et al v. Amazon
Latest Posts
The Census Bureau called the 2010 census “the largest mobilization of a civilian workforce conducted by the Federal Government.” It hired more than 850,000 temporary employees for the undertaking.
The plaintiffs alleged that the Census Bureau had a policy requiring almost every applicant who’d ever been arrested to produce court documentation within 30 days. This policy applied regardless of whether they’d been convicted, the nature of the arrest, its relationship to the job, or when it took place, according to the lawsuit. Among the few applicants who were able to provide the documentation, the bureau allegedly followed an arbitrary procedure that still screened out many individuals.
The policies and practices disproportionately harmed Black and Latino applicants, who are arrested and incarcerated at rates substantially higher than white people, the plaintiffs alleged. The disparate impact violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because it was not job related or consistent with business necessity, the plaintiffs alleged.
In addition to the payment, the Census Bureau agreed to hire consultants to help improve its criminal background screening process for the 2020 census. In addition, the agency gave rejected applicants a choice of two options: they could take advantage of an initiative to help them clear up issues that shouldn’t be on their record reports, or it would give them advance notice of temporary hiring opportunities for the 2020 census.
Outten & Golden partnered on this case with Community Legal Services of Philadelphia, Community Service Society of New York, the Indian Law Resource Center of Helena, Montana, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and the Center for Constitutional Rights.