EEOC v. Morgan Stanley
Popular Issues
Latest Cases & Investigations
EEOC v. Morgan Stanley
Perez, et al. v. Allstate
Rotondo v. JPMorgan
Strauch v. Computer Science Corp.
Burr v. Loadsmart
Wilmuth et al v. Amazon
Latest Posts
Uber is practically synonymous with app-based transportation, serving passengers as well as delivering food and groceries. In 2024, it had 13,100 employees in the United States and 31,000 globally.
The lawsuit, which was filed in California federal court, alleged Uber used a “stack ranking” system that forced managers to rank employees from worst to best, regardless of actual performance differences. This system disproportionately harmed women and engineers of color, who received lower rankings on average despite similar or better performance, their complaint said. It also prevented employees from getting promotions, which were tied to the same flawed performance review system.
Uber had a workplace culture that was not only unequal but openly hostile, the engineers alleged. According to the complaint, women and engineers of color faced demeaning treatment and exclusion, often with the knowledge or encouragement of senior leadership. The lawsuit claimed that Uber failed to protect its employees, allowing bias and harassment to persist across teams and departments.
The settlement O&G negotiated included more than financial terms. It also included long-term systemic changes in an effort to keep these problems from happening again. Uber agreed to revise how it sets pay, evaluates performance, and makes promotion decisions.
The company also committed to strengthening its systems for fair pay, diversity, training, and workplace investigations. It promised to provide better professional support, so employees would have the tools they needed to grow. To ensure accountability, Uber agreed to external monitoring.