Layoffs & Closings

State WARN Acts

Outten & Golden attorneys are familiar with both the federal WARN Act and with the many state versions of the statute, and represent employees across the country in actions to recover lost pay.

The following states or territories have their own versions of the WARN Act that expand on the protections of the federal law, by covering small layoffs or by having fewer exceptions: California, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee, Wisconsin and the Virgin Islands.

State WARN Acts may offer workers stronger protection than the federal WARN Act, such as longer notice periods and higher damages. Some states also have a lower threshold for a RIF to qualify as a mass layoff, as low as 25 employees.  For example, the New York state WARN Act expands coverage to employers of only 50 or more full-time employees, as compared with 100 full-time employees under the federal WARN Act. The New York WARN Act also requires that an employer provide 90 days’ advance notice of a plant closing or mass layoff – 30 days more than required under federal law. Under the New York law, employers who violate the notice requirements owe employees 60 calendar days of back pay and benefits, as compared to 60 working days, which can result in more compensation for employees.

California is another state that offers more protections to workers than the federal WARN Act.  California’s state WARN Act covers more employers and contains more triggering events than the federal WARN Act.  It requires companies with at least seventy-five employees (both full-time and part-time) to provide 60 days’ notice to employees in the following circumstances: a layoff affecting at least fifty employees within a thirty-day period; relocation of all or substantially all of a company’s operations to a new location at least one hundred miles away from the present location; or termination of all or substantially all of a company’s industrial or commercial operations.

New Jersey’s WARN law stands out because it provides employers virtually no defenses.  California law does not provide employers the “unforeseeable business circumstances” defense found in federal WARN.

State WARN laws, like the federal WARN law, are technical and how they intersect with the federal law may be complicated.  Outten & Golden lawyers can help employees from every state who have lost their jobs in a mass layoff, reduction in force, or company closing to evaluate whether they have legal claims against their employers and how much they may be entitled.  Our team has represented employees in every federal district in the United States, in district and bankruptcy courts.

For more information about state WARN Act provisions, please visit Outten & Golden's WARN Act website.

Find O&G attorneys associated with this area
Related Cases

Colortree Group, Inc.


On June 6, 2019, Outten & Golden filed a class action suit against Colortree Group, Inc. ("Colortree") seeking to recover 60 days wages and benefits under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification ("WARN") Act, and unpaid wages, including accrued vacation pay, under the Virginia Wage...

New England Motor Freight


Outten & Golden filed suit against Debtors New England Motor Freight, Inc., et al. (“NEMF") seeking to recover 60 days wages and benefits for former employees under the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification ("WARN") Act and one week of pay for every year of service under the New Jersey WARN Act for affected employees who were not offered a severance payment and those who did not sign a valid release of their claims.


Benefits canceled, Wood-Mode employees go from loyal to 'betrayed, mad'

The Daily Item - Marcia Moore

Tammy Heeter woke up Friday as a loyal former Wood-Mode employee and ended the day feeling “betrayed.”

“We were lied to,” she said after receiving an automated text message notifying her and the 937 other laid off workers that medical, dental, vision and other insurance coverage was ending as of midnight Friday.

It was a stark change from earlier in the day when Heeter picked up her final paycheck from Wood-Mode and joined more than 200 other displaced employees at the VFW in Selinsgrove to hear from a New York City attorney about a pending class-action lawsuit against the company.


Fisker Auto's Ch. 11 WARN Fight May Go To Trial, Judge Says

Law360 - Jeff Montgomery

Remnants of bankrupt electric car maker Fisker Automotive kicked up fresh sparks Wednesday, when a Delaware judge said the company and laid-off workers should consider dates for a trial in a dispute over first-in-line payment claims.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross made the point after arguments on a class of workers’ motion for summary judgement for their claim to first priority rights to a $1.9 million estate reserve to pay Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act compensation.

“This case has been pending for 5½ years. I realize it has been a contentious process, but I’m hoping...

Closed Mortgage Lender Hit With WARN Act Suit In Del.

Law360 - Jeff Montgomery

Former employees of recently shuttered Live Well Financial Inc. opened a proposed class Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act complaint Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for Delaware, citing no-notice, mass layoffs in California and Virginia.

Lead plaintiff Monica Williams, a loan account manager at the company's Richmond, Virginia, headquarters, said she and hundreds of other employees in Virginia and San Diego, California, were fired without warning on May 3.

The two-count lawsuit alleged violations of both the federal WARN Act and its California state counterpart. Both...