CLIENT ALERT: Please read this special message.

Layoffs & Closings

Losing a job, especially without warning, can be one of life’s most disturbing experiences.  Employees in these situations may be protected by federal and local “WARN” laws.

These WARN laws let you see into the future - to know in advance that your job is going away. These laws require employers to give advanced notice of a job loss prior to shutting down a large worksite or conducting a large layoff.

The purpose of these laws is to give employees time to prepare for job loss, to arrange their financial affairs, to look for new work, to take a deep breath, focus, and figure out what to do next. 

Outten & Golden attorneys represent clients who have WARN Act claims, because they lost their jobs without enough notice in mass layoffs or plant closings (which includes shutdowns of worksites, offices or other facilities).

Outten & Golden’s WARN lawyers are particularly experienced in this area of the law.  They have had the honor of representing employees in more reported WARN cases, since these laws have been on the books, than any other lawyers.

How the WARN Act works for you – when your work is taken away

The federal notice statute is called the WARN Act, and several states have “mini-warn acts” which add to its protections.  These WARN Acts cover employees across virtually all industries, whether they are blue- and white-collar workers, salaried or hourly, part-time or full-time. 

These laws recognize that when a company withholds notice of coming job loss, it harms not only employees, but their families, and communities.  A surprise job loss hinders the employee’s ability to overcome its ill effects, compared to the person who gets a running start by getting advanced notice.  To compensate for the injury, the employer must pay the employee 60 days’ wages and benefits. This represents the pre-termination period in which the employee could have minimized the hardships, had notice been given.  In addition, the employer pays compensation for expenses incurred due to the loss of benefits which would have continued during that WARN notice period.  This may include health insurance expenditures as well as medical care and pharmacy expenses.

To obtain these payments for clients, Outten & Golden lawyers prosecute the WARN claims not just for certain employees, but on behalf of all the employees affected by the mass layoff or shutdown. These cases are known as class actions.

Class actions do not require you to sue, or even to join, once they are started

WARN claims are almost always class actions – a type of lawsuit in which the plaintiff is a group not an individual.  This spares individual employees from having to fight on their own.  It is only fitting and fair that WARN cases are class actions.  After all, employers treat employees as a group when terminating them in a plant closing or large, mass layoff (also called a "RIF," short for "reduction in force").  A WARN action is naturally a class action, which the law recognizes.  It is not an individual, “he-said, she-said” case.  It is the group – that the employer created – that is asking for their notice pay, to set the ledgers straight.  It is efficient and economical, especially because employees in a class action bear no direct expense or burden to actively participate in the litigation.  They can “sit back,” once one employee agrees to represent the group.

Who the class includes

Groups as small as 50 or as large as thousands of employees may all be covered in a single WARN class action.  These groups will include those who worked at the particular worksites where the layoff or shutdown occurred, and even those who worked remotely, such as from home or the road.  If they reported to the site, even by computer, they may also be considered part of a layoff or shutdown, and class members in the WARN class action.

Class action litigation requires a particular expertise, resources, and skill to prosecute successfully. Outten & Golden attorneys have substantial experience prosecuting and settling employment class actions and are well versed in class action law, particularly in mass layoffs and plant closings. 

How to begin

Starting a class action begins with a call.  There is no charge.  Ask Outten & Golden’s WARN Act team to find out more by contacting us.  We can help you now.

Related Cases

Bloomberg Staffers Lawsuit

Status:
Active

Note: For more information, please visit our Bloomberg Staffers website: https://www.bloombergstafferslawsuit.com/

In November 2019, Mike Bloomberg announced his candidacy for President of the United States and thereafter his campaign began hiring staff, including field organizers, throughout the...

New England Motor Freight

Status:
Resolved
Updated:

Outten & Golden filed suit against Debtors New England Motor Freight, Inc., et al. (“NEMF") seeking to recover 60 days wages and benefits for former employees under the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification ("WARN") Act and one week of pay for every year of service under the New Jersey WARN Act for affected employees who were not offered a severance payment and those who did not sign a valid release of their claims.

News

Velodyne Lidar accused of using pandemic as excuse for big job cuts

Silicon Valley Business Journal - Cromwell Schubarth

Velodyne Lidar Inc. was accused in a lawsuit filed Friday of cutting 140 jobs improperly with only one day's notice and using the COVID-19 pandemic as cover for shifting jobs overseas.

The lawsuit filed in federal court says the San Jose-based autonomous driving sensor pioneer should have given workers 60-day notice, according to Bloomberg.

Velodyne said in a written notice that the job cuts were due to the pandemic, according to the lawsuit, but it “had already begun transferring production jobs overseas beginning in the summer of 2019 and had planned to continue doing so prior to the...

Silicon Valley Startup Firings Over Virus Face Early Court Test

Bloomberg - Robert Burnson

Velodyne Lidar Inc., which designs the sensor systems that help driverless cars navigate, was sued for laying off 140 workers with one day’s notice, an early test of whether courts will get involved as the coronavirus wipes out jobs in Silicon Valley.

The San Jose, California-based company -- identified by Uber Technologies Inc. two years ago as its primary supplier of lidar, or light detection and ranging -- is accused of using the virus as an excuse to downsize when it was actually preparing to move production overseas.

The cuts at Velodyne were among more than 5,000 firings of startup...

Bloomberg Campaign Sued by Ex Field Organizer in Class-Action Case for Breach of Contract

Daily Beast - Emma Tucker

Mike Bloomberg’s presidential campaign was sued Monday by its former field organizer, alleging that thousands of workers were duped into jobs and not paid overtime only to be laid off when the former New York mayor exited the race. The class-action lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in New York City on Monday, argues that the campaign deprived employees “of promised income and health-care benefits, leaving them and their families potentially uninsured in the face of a global pandemic.” Sally Abrahamson, a lawyer representing the former field organizer named Donna Wood, told The New...